Chairman of the South West Regional Health Authority (SWRHA) Dr Lackram Bodoe said a back-up of medical waste in the San Fernando General Hospital had to Perform with a delay in payment to a contractor and not the malfunctioning of This incinerator.

Responding to complaints about the dangers posed by the gathered medical waste, which included amputated limbs, needles, and bloodstained items, Bodoe promised that the $9 million incinerator installed last year has been functioning well.

He said it had been allowed to collect because daily paid workers refused to work on Tuesday.

Speaking with members of the media at SWRHA’s symposium on leadership in the Southern Academy of Performing Arts Wednesday, Bodoe stated:

“I wish to provide the confidence that the incinerator itself is working well.

“This was a brand new incinerator that was set up last year and the problem had to do by a contractor who was supposed to remove the crap and there has been a delay of funding and that’s what created a temporary situation .”

Asked how soon the situation will be rectified, he said:”I’ve just been given the confidence by the CEO that the issue has been dealt with as we speak, therefore I anticipate at the end of the day it’ll be sorted out”

In addition, Bodoe stated the SWRHA was also considering introducing a new type of technology, called the radio wave technology for incineration, which was much more atmosphere friendly.

Nevertheless , a Public Service Association representative, who wanted to remain anonymous, stated the incinerator was breaking down on a regular basis because it had been set up last year and was not working at this moment.

“They had to revert to the old incinerator and that’s dangerous and unhealthy to individuals functioning that incinerator.

He said workers took the actions on Tuesday since last week they were assured the trash problem could have been sorted out.

1. i) Patient and operator safety and system performance should not be adversely affected by fluid spills.
2. ii) If the unit is affected, it should fail safely.

1. c) Overcurrent Protection
2. i) Loss of power to other equipment on the same branch circuit due to internal equipment faults should be

prevented by using fuses or circuit breakers that are clearly labeled and easy to replace or reset.

1. ii) If fuses are used, a spare fuse should be provided in a labeled holder located next to the main fuse holder.

Permanent markings near each fuse holder should indicate fuse ratings.

1. d) Line Voltage Variation
2. i) The unit should operate satisfactorily at line voltages from -12.5% to +8%

of the nominal line voltage of 220Volts.

12. ii) The unit should not be damaged by voltages from -21% to +12.5% of the nominal line voltage of 220Volts.

1. e) Electromagnetic Interference (EMI)
2. i) The unit’s performance should not be affected by EMI radiated or conducted through the power lines from another

device.

1. ii) If the unit is affected, it should fail safely.

50 to 60kg/hr and 100 to 120kg/hr diesel powered heater.1. Capability to Blaze the Adhering To Types of Waste:
Family members waste, glass, steel, lightweight light weight aluminum containers as well as additionally window extrudes, steel containers (shattered), wood, tires, soft goods, plastic containers, stress packs, medical waste along with quarantine waste.
2. Required Blazing Capacity:
Around 4,500 loads every year. The incinerator has to effective in blazing sort of waste discussed or any type of blends thereof at a cost of 3 heaps per hour. If needed, the system will certainly be produced to complete at least five successive days non-stop.
3. Burner Layout Requirements:
The system ought to be straightforward in design and treatment, with marginal digital elements.
The burner as well as linked air pollution control modern-day technology will certainly be:
a.Low being use supporting fuel;
b.Low in electrical power use;
c.Require extremely little pre-processing of Neighborhood strong waste;
d.The air contamination system shall abide by EU Waste Incineration Guideline 2000/76 as well as additionally creates part of the entire incinerator arrangement.
3.1 Particular Information that must be Supplied the Design
3.1.1 Burner Details:
a.Batch Lots Capability;
b.Primary chamber style (thickness, diameter, size, insulation, cellular lining, quantity fireplace area, weight); c. Second chamber design (density, size, size, insulation, cellular lining, volume fireplace location, weight);.
c.Exhaust pile style (thickness, diameter, lining variety of areas, total stack size, elevation over base, weight);.
d.Type as well as variety of supporting gas heating systems;.
e.Fuel demands– – type, quantities;.
f.Electrical power use;.
g.Electrical solutions called for;.
h.Water demands– – quantities;.
i.Any various other input needs and also consumables;.
j.Temperatures to be achieved to make certain suitable destruction of waste and also follow called for air contamination control needs (EU Waste Incineration Guideline 2000/76);.
k.Residence time to assure optimal destruction of waste as well as follow needed air pollution control criteria;.
l.Potential weight decrease (percent) of waste;.
m.Options to immediately and also constantly display as well as document info such as days, time of day, set sequential number;.
n.A temperature or aesthetic sign to reveal heat status of equipment; as well as likewise.
o.Details on visuals screens in addition to/ or computer system taping gizmos.

3.1.2 Air Contamination Control System Information.
a.The type of air contamination control devices selected will certainly comply with EU WID Waste Incineration.
b.Directive 2000/76;.
c.Details on the gas cleansing systems to enhance the removal of excellent little bits, acid gases and likewise substantial.
d.metals;.
e.Details on aspects, such as:.
quencher;.
condenser/ absorber;.
venturi scrubber;.
entrainment separator and also.
discharges stack( s).
Electric power usage;.
f.Any different other input needs in addition to consumables (e.g. lime);.
g.Details on graphic display screens along with/ or computer system recording devices;.
h.Environmental requirements – – – – The system would absolutely have the capacity/ capability to follow essential air top quality standards; i.e.EU Waste Incineration Policy 2000/76. (or comparable standards as well as requirements acceptable to the Australian Commonwealth Federal Government Division of the Setup);.
i.Specify air contamination criteria that are kept an eye on.
3.1.3 Site Demands for the Burner.
a.Total land area dimentions;.
b.Infrastructure required (supply of water, power supply water drainage); and also.
c.Any particular eco-friendly or climatic/meteorological aspects that calls for consideration.
3.1.4 Housing Needs as well as also Style.
a.Details on demands for a safeguarded unit for the burner and also connected air contamination control system. The space will absolutely be made to obtain job-related health and safety demands such as: a. Free space is conveniently offered on all sides as well as warm radiation is maintained a minimal offering the operators an:.
b.easy convenient environment as well as also air flow;.
c.There are secure storage area facilities for waste;.
d.There are measures to remain clear of vermin along with bugs;.
e.The products will be of sufficient architectural thickness for safety and to stand up versus sea rust.
4. Training, Upkeep As Well As Instructions Manuals.
4.1 Upkeep Handbooks.
Supply information on maintenance demands, such as:.
a.General cleaning in addition to upkeep– – consistency, abilities/ technological experience needed;.
b.Expected lifetime of elements as well as the system as a whole;.
c.Expected consistency of the demand for replacement of components;.
d.Availability of parts as well as place of suppliers;.
e.Frequency of need for substantial overhauls; and additionally.
f.Estimated down time needed for general maintenance as well as significant overhauls.a burner for our dead pets in the cattle ranch particularly fowl.

Speaking at the inauguration of this new Wateserv EU-funded autoclave producing plant for treating animal waste, Wasteserv CEO Tonio Montebello reported that the job was part of its drive to enhance the country’s waste treatment infrastructure.

Montebello also explained that the plant could lead to substantial savings produced in the incineration plant, which processes several 6,000 tonnes of waste per year.

Projects director Jean Luke Zarb explained that the issue with the present system was that a great deal of energy was being wasted in incinerating water or fats in the carcasses.

“This plant will work basically as a industrial pressure cooker in that it will dry up the carcasses beforehand,” he said, adding that this could finally result in less electricity required by the incinerator.

He added that the fats would likewise be utilized as fuel for the plant itself, therefore reducing its fuel intake.

Stressing that the plant would also be utilized to take care of substances coming from Gozo, Montebello explained that the plant would also banish issues that normally climbed if the incinerator was under maintenance, ensuring a smooth transition and functioning.

Environment minister Leo Brincat reported that the fall in gas consumption could also finally lead to less dangerous greenhouse gas emissions.

“Another novelty that the plant will present, is in died foodstuffs containing animal by products, which would normally need to be incinerated,” he explained with a pizza with meat as an example.

“The plant will allow us to take care of these foods and then forward them to other remedies plants to flip them into biofuels,” he included.

Brincat reported that the job would also raise Wasteserv’s overall operation, and that the company was also looking forward to the inauguration of the Malta North MBT in the forthcoming months.

EU funding parliamentary secretary Ian Borg added that the undertaking, 85 percent of which was financed by the EU, was also finished in record time – about annually.

“The government is also currently evaluating jobs for the latest $200 million fund bundle under the European Regional Development Fund,” he explained.

EU funds parliamentary secretary Ian Borg added that the project, 85% of which was funded by the EU, was also completed in record time – about a year.

“The government is also currently evaluating projects for the latest €200 million fund package under the European Regional Development Fund,” he said.

From: http://www.maltatoday.com.mt/news/national/61095/animal_waste_management_plant_inaugurated_in_marsa#.VqX95lK-LmK